The Last Podcast - Latest Comments in Friendfeed is for Early Adopters. Why? Because Nobody Else Needs It

Re: Friendfeed is for Early Adopters. Why? Because Nobody Else Needs It

Money Ideas — Thu, 07 May 2009 09:23:53 -0000

I think both FF and Twitter sucks.

Re: Friendfeed is for Early Adopters. Why? Because Nobody Else Needs It

Odzyskiwanie danych — Tue, 31 Mar 2009 08:53:20 -0000

I understand why people develop those sites - it's a tested market and they know what to implement. But on the downside everyone's using Facebook so most of those other social websites are pretty pointless - even if it had a lot better functionality I wouldn't switch simply because my whole network of friends is on fb.

Re: Friendfeed is for Early Adopters. Why? Because Nobody Else Needs It

local marketing — Fri, 13 Feb 2009 10:56:22 -0000

I have a hard time with it being cliquey. That makes it hard to really get a grasp on it and make me want to stay. If I don't feel comfortable with something I don't like to stay with it. And that's how I feel about FF. They need to make more adjustments before it really goes crazy.

Re: Friendfeed is for Early Adopters. Why? Because Nobody Else Needs It

centernetworks — Mon, 09 Feb 2009 20:14:29 -0000

thanks for the link! and you are right - it is cliquey

Re: Friendfeed is for Early Adopters. Why? Because Nobody Else Needs It

warzabidul — Mon, 09 Feb 2009 09:19:29 -0000

Being a tool of early adopters is fine, and in fact is great for community. Personally I like all websites that are for the early adopting masses because it means that those who use it have more time to give to the site.

Twitter is going mainstream and one consequence is that you have thousands of new users but that only use it five minutes a day. As a result there's a lot of new posts but the interactivity has collapsed as a result.